Contact us T +32 (0)2 626 07 20 | info@europeangreens.eu

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Flickr

Donate

  • Login to your account
  • User account
  • About Us
    • Organisation
    • People
    • Networks and Working Groups
    • Guidelines
  • Our Positions
    • Positions
    • Resolutions
    • Policy Papers
    • Manifesto
  • Get involved
    • Climate Action
    • European Green Recovery Campaign
    • Green Talking Heads
    • European Ideas Lab
    • The Green Screen
    • Local Councillors' Network
    • Trans-Inclusive Feminist Campaign
  • Member Parties
  • News
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • Brand Assets
    • Communications Team
  • Events
Home
  • About Us
  • Our Positions
  • Get involved
  • Member Parties
  • News
  • Events
  • Positions
    • Foreign and Security Policy
    • Europe and Democracy
    • Climate and Energy
    • Economy and Jobs
    • Human Rights and Migration
    • Social Justice and Health
    • Environment and Food
  • Resolutions
  • Policy Papers
  • Manifesto

For an open Europe with strong fundamental rights

Share
Share on FacebookShare on Twittershare on Linked Inshare on Google Plusshare via email

Resolution accepted at the EGP Council meeting, Malmö, Sweden, October 16-18, 2009

The Council’s 2009 framework decision on data protection in police cooperation is so weak and full of exceptions that the European Data Protection Supervisor calls for a complete re-start in this area.

The “Stockholm Programme” which is to define the framework for EU police and customs cooperation, rescue services, criminal and civil law cooperation as well as asylum, migration, and visa policy for 2010–2014 and which is due to be adopted in the European Council in December, 2009, recently presented to us promises to create an “area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen”. Looking into the details, however, we find that the European Union they talk of will bring more freedoms and possibilities only for law enforcement agencies and less security for the people and their fundamental rights - such as privacy - and justice. It sets up a new phase in closing up borders and having a close surveillance of those who enter and those already inside.

Surveillance and profiling: The Commission and Presidency envisage a free flow of information among law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Europol is supposed to become a European- wide information-sharing agency with little parliamentary oversight, and a specialized new IT Agency is proposed for connecting the data about our police files, fingerprints, and visa records. We insist that informational self-determination is a fundamental right. This implies cutting back the growth of data heaps, access to stored data only after judge approval, and no interconnection of existing systems. Electronic centralization of governments’ knowledge about us is just as dangerous for democracy as institutional centralization in the government is for the balance of power.

Whose rights and whose security: We disagree with the approach of the Council and the Commission to only include EU citizens in the group of those whose fundamental rights have to be protected or even “secured”. Looking at the historical development of surveillance and other repressive measures, regulations for third country nationals and weaker parts of the population often constituted the first step on the way to threatening the whole society.

The wrong and misleading “balance” metaphor: The Stockholm Programme pretends to find a balance between fundamental rights and civil liberties on the one hand and security and surveillance on the other hand. However, we disagree with the approach that the rights of a person can be balanced by security measures of the state. Fundamental rights, such as the right to informational self-determination and the right not to be suspected in lack of evidence are impartial and cannot be intruded by any means of anti-terrorism or other security interests. We cannot restrict freedom in order to save freedom.

Serious evaluation before adopting any new measures: In the last ten years, we have seen a number of repressive measures such as the mandatory retention of all telecommunications data, the introduction of militarized border controls through Frontex, which do not always follow the respect of basic human rights, EU cooperation against migrants and refugees with undemocratic states such as Libya that has, till now, refused to sign and ratify the Geneva Convention on Human Rights. Not all of these measures have shown results at all and a number of them have been dangerous and have heard harsh criticism from human rights organizations. Before any new means are taken up, it is necessary to revise what has been done so far and to take away measures that have proven insufficient or which stand against the European understanding of human dignity, fundamental rights and civil liberties.

Dangerous trend to a general Surveillance: The Council’s 2009 framework decision on data protection in police cooperation is so weak and full of exceptions that the European Data Protection Supervisor calls for a complete re-start in this area. Plans in the Stockholm Programme to harmonize information standards and interoperability for security agencies will only lead to a situation in which even de-centrally managed databases get more and more connected. The citizen will become the object of more and more dragnet investigations and profiling exercises, while at the same time losing sight and control of his and her personal information. The citizens must be granted a right to check and, if necessary, correct any information related to themselves. We still oppose the blanket mandatory retention of telecommunications data and support legal and constitutional complaints against it. The use of personal data collected in the private sector by law enforcement agencies, such as passenger name records and SWIFT financial transaction data, can only be allowed under strict conditions such as a judge approval, and only on an individual basis. We also oppose plans for an EU-wide entry-exit database, for there are already signs that this database will be expanded to a comprehensive scheme for the surveillance of all air, sea, and land travel within and across member states. This not only constitutes a violation of the right to privacy and the presumption of innocence, it also goes against the idea of a Europe without borders.

Control the Agencies

The EU sets up agencies in different priority areas, officially just accomplishing “technical tasks”. Amongst them are Frontex, Europol, the European Defence Agency, and the proposed IT management agency for law-enforcement databases. These agencies are gaining more and more power while the possibilities for democratic control do not keep up. Frontex, for example, has its own legal personality and undertakes operative tasks. The Future Group even suggested that Frontex should have the right to negotiate treaties with third countries bilaterally. Regarding this development we are deeply concerned that the surveillance mania and the defence of the Fortress Europe will be more and more institutionalized. We are furthermore worried that crucial competencies slip out of the Parliament's hands. Therefore, we urge to increase the transparency and the accountability towards the Parliament in the above mentioned agencies. We call for establishing a parliamentary rapporteur for every agency. Moreover, every agency should present its working programme to the European Parliament that would have the possibility for amendments.

Migration and Asylum

The references to civil rights in the Stockholm Programme only address EU citizens. A high number of people living in the EU is just left aside. We demand from the EU to improve access to protection of fundamental rights for non-EU citizens. Immigration is not a burden, but a reality and a necessity. The Commission at least is recognizing this, but is only pushing for migrants who fit perfectly well in the EU's labour market, ignoring the needs of people who do not fit into this scheme and as well ignoring the fact that a lot of forced migration is caused by EU policies such as climate change and fishery policy. We notice and oppose the criminalizing of “illegal” immigration in the EU and EU member states. We reiterate that everybody should be guaranteed the possibility of asking for it.

Strengthening a European movement

The Stockholm Programme comes after years of expanding the powers and institutions of the security and surveillance apparatuses. As we can see in history, restrictions of fundamental rights often came along by restricting the rights of asylum seekers and “illegal” people and then were transferred onto the whole society. We are in line with the population when we demand that turning back the wheel is more than urgent. We will cooperate closely with civil society groups and activists on the Stockholm Programme. We will ensure that it receives the public scrutiny and debate it deserves. We will unmask its rhetoric of security for the citizen. We will fight it in its current form and we will carefully and critically watch the implementation process in the years to come. It is not too late: We still can turn Europe into a true defender of civil liberties.

Having regard to all this, the European Greens urge the Presidency and Commission to strive for a real sharing of responsibility in dealing with asylum applications among member states. This solidarity has to be obligatory. We urge the European Institutions and the EU Member States to work for a programme that secures fundamental rights, human rights, and freedom in Europe. 

 

Download the complete resolution in PDF format here...

Recent News

Icon:
Title:

The end of Roe vs. Wade in the US must push us to defend abortion rights in Europe

Post date:
30 June 2022
Body:

European Greens Co-Chair Mélanie Vogel (France), and Committee Members Mina Jack Tolu (Malta) and Malgorzata Tracz (Poland) speak out on the current state of abortion rights in Europe. Access to safe, legal and free abortion must be guaranteed across Europe and abroad to create a more humane world for all and protect those most marginalised!

Icon:
Title:

Dritan Abazović, the First Green Prime Minister of Montenegro: ‘Nothing is impossible!’

Post date:
23 June 2022
Body:

Dritan Abazović, president of our member party URA and Prime Minister of Montenegro since April 2022, is driving huge changes in a small Balkan country. URA was established in 2015 and represents all ethnicities and stands for a European, ecological and democratic Montenegro. Abazović's plans for Montenegro include ridding the country of corruption and pursuing a pro-European agenda.

Icon:
Title:

The European Greens welcome new candidate member parties Hållbart Initiativ and Progresīvie

Post date:
17 June 2022
Body:

Åland's Sustainable Initiative (Hållbart Initiativ) and Latvia's the Progressives (Progresīvie) have been accepted as our newest candidate member parties by delegates at the 35th European Green Party Council in Riga, Latvia. We are proud to welcome them into our Green family and to interview them to discuss their priorities in their respective countries.

More News

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Flickr
Tweet Contents:

RT @anna_cavazzini: Amazing news from Brazil: a historic Supreme Court ruling on climate change! 💪🏼

Tweet Author:
europeangreens
Creation Date:
5 hours ago
Tweet Contents:

✊ These policies are important steps forward, but we need more for the EU to live up to a 1.5°C future. As Greens, we will keep fighting for an ambitious European Green Deal! https://t.co/vktYxRddhj

Tweet Author:
europeangreens
Creation Date:
5 hours ago
Tweet Contents:

🚘 Learn more about the #SocialClimateFund and the #EmissionStandards for cars! https://t.co/19CrKbNEs8

Tweet Author:
europeangreens
Creation Date:
5 hours ago

Sign up to our newsletter

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Fill in the blank.

Take charge of your future. Donate Green.

Chip in today to help us build a Greener Europe!

Donate

  • Organisation
    • About
    • History
    • Councils
    • Congresses
    • Finance Advisory Board
    • Amendments Committee
    • Conciliation Panel
  • People
    • Committee
    • Team
    • Vacancies
    • Traineeships
  • Networks and Working Groups
    • Networks
      • Balkan
      • Gender
      • tilt!
      • Queer
      • Local Councillors
      • Seniors
    • Working Groups
      • Foreign and Security Policy
      • Future of Europe
      • Trade
  • Guidelines
    • Charter
    • Statutes
    • Rulebook
    • Finances
    • Privacy Policy
  • Our Positions
    • Positions
    • Resolutions
    • Policy Papers
    • Manifesto
  • Member Parties
  • News
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • Brand Assets
    • Communications Team
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • The Green Screen
    • Climate Action for the People and the Planet
    • Trans-Inclusive Feminist Campaign
    • European Green Recovery Campaign
  • Donate
Home

Rue du Taciturne 34

B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

T +32 (0) 2 626 07 20

info@europeangreens.eu

© European Greens - With the financial support of the European Parliament. Sole liability remains with the author.

cookies