Contact us T +32 (0)2 626 07 20 | info@europeangreens.eu

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Flickr

Donate

  • Login to your account
  • User account
  • About Us
    • Organisation
    • People
    • Networks and Working Groups
    • Guidelines
  • Our Positions
    • Positions
    • Resolutions
    • Policy Papers
    • Manifesto
  • Get involved
    • Climate Action
    • European Green Recovery Campaign
    • Green Talking Heads
    • European Ideas Lab
    • The Green Screen
    • Local Councillors' Network
    • Trans-Inclusive Feminist Campaign
  • Member Parties
  • News
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • Brand Assets
    • Communications Team
  • Events
Home
  • About Us
  • Our Positions
  • Get involved
  • Member Parties
  • News
  • Events
  • Positions
    • Foreign and Security Policy
    • Europe and Democracy
    • Climate and Energy
    • Economy and Jobs
    • Human Rights and Migration
    • Social Justice and Health
    • Environment and Food
  • Resolutions
  • Policy Papers
  • Manifesto

Don't use EU budget for defence research

Share
Share on FacebookShare on Twittershare on Linked Inshare on Google Plusshare via email

Resolution adopted as amended, Athens Council, November 2012 (.pdf version is attached)

Within the current Multiannual Financial Framework (2007-2014) the EU spends around 1 billion on security research in the context of the Framework Program for Research (FP7). During the negotiations for the Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020, conservatives within the European Parliament (EPP) agreed to limit security research to strictly civilian applications, technology and knowledge. For the Greens this was a condition sine qua non for accepting the financing of security research from the EU budget at all.  

We as Greens strongly oppose the notion that security only encompasses technologies that focus on military deterrence and surveillance. The dominant influence of corporate interests and the arms industry on the understanding of security needs to be questioned. We have to reclaim the concept of security as for us it also arises from equality, social cohesion, environmental justice as well as general well-being and inclusion in a society.

With the financial and economic crisis hitting national defence budgets the right as well as Liberals and Socialists and Democrats are now changing their policy regarding security research. In contrast to the Greens, they have always supported the sponsoring of the rapidly growing "new security market" including EU funding for research in border surveillance and dual-use technology. But now, they even go a step further.

Parts of the defence industry, together with conservative, but also socialist and liberal members of the European Parliament are now trying to open the EU budget for defence research. Their idea is to spend 200-300 million EUR on Defence Research which would put the EU just behind the UK and France (maybe Germany) when it comes to annual spending in this field.

The gradual pooling of capabilities by willing Member States in the framework of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) can help reduce military expenditure and discourage go-it-alone actions. However, it should be noted that the military missions the EU has undertaken since 2003 are mainly of a peacekeeping nature. The European Council has failed to update its 2003 security strategy, which makes it hard to assess which capabilities and technologies Europe needs. EU funding for security research still lacks a mechanism to ensure compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as is illustrated by the continued support by the European Commission for the total surveillance project INDECT, against the will of the European Parliament. For all these reasons, using the EU budget for defence research would be premature.

Since the European Parliament witnessed the first vote in favour of introducing Defence Research within the framework of the Horizon 2020 research programme there is a clear need to reassert that the Treaty on European Union puts civilian before military assets in the definition of the CSDP. Our aim is to bring this issue of major and strategic importance to the attention of all European citizens and national parliamentarians in order to organise opposition.

Against this backdrop, the European Greens are promoting the following position:

  • To limit EU research programs strictly to civilian security and peace research, excluding also research in border surveillance and dual use technologies;
  • To avoid any link between Horizon 2020 and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), in particular the EU Defence Agency (EDA);
  • To introduce language within Horizon 2020 which stipulates that under no circumstances the programme should be used to research and develop weapons, ammunition, other equipment and capacities with lethal impact and excessive destructive power; 
  • To ensure full compliance of the security research program with export control standards such as Common Position 2008/944/CFSP and the Dual Use Regulation 1232/2011shall be ensured, the European Commission shall closely monitor that those knowledge, products which are the result of funding by this programme are by no means transferred to companies, states and other actors who are not in compliance by the criteria laid down in Common Position 2008/944/CFSP;
  • To ensure that more than half of the overall amount is to be spend should be devoted to non-technological research; e.g. social science research on peace, conflict and cooperation; another 10% should be earmarked for research focusing on the legal, political and social implications of security technologies; 
  • Each research project on new technologies should include its own research and assessment component which explores the implications of the technology in question in the following fields: social and political implications (for example positive or negative impact on redistribution), sustainable environment, positive or negative impact on healthy years of life expectancy. Taking these aspects into consideration an ethical and fundamental rights impact assessment should be carried out prior to the launch of any technology based project and after termination of such a project.
Related downloads:
AttachmentSize
PDF icon EN116.74 KB
Position:
Economy & Jobs

Recent News

Icon:
Co-Chairs Thomas Waitz and Mélanie Vogel
Title:

Our newly elected Co-Chairs Mélanie Vogel and Thomas Waitz share their vision for the future of the European Greens

Post date:
12 July 2022
Body:

Mélanie Vogel and Thomas Waitz speak on the future of the European Green Party, the current political priorities for the Greens, and how they're getting ready for the 2024 elections.

Icon:
Title:

Sustainable agriculture can help tackle a food crisis fuelled by climate shocks and war

Post date:
08 July 2022
Body:

Together, Russia and Ukraine exported more than a quarter of the world's wheat before the war. Now, the war is impacting food security across the globe. As Greens, we believe that food should never be used as a geopolitical weapon – and we should never be in the position for it to be used against us.

Position:
Environment & Food
Icon:
Title:

The end of Roe vs. Wade in the US must push us to defend abortion rights in Europe

Post date:
30 June 2022
Body:

European Greens Co-Chair Mélanie Vogel (France), and Committee Members Mina Jack Tolu (Malta) and Malgorzata Tracz (Poland) speak out on the current state of abortion rights in Europe. Access to safe, legal and free abortion must be guaranteed across Europe and abroad to create a more humane world for all and protect those most marginalised!

More News

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Flickr
Tweet Contents:

🇯🇵 In 1945 the US detonated 2 atomic bombs on Hiroshima & Nagasaki

☢️ Now, @antonioguterres signals nuclear threats from the war in Ukraine and international tensions put us 'one miscalculation away from nuclear annihilation'

🕊 Only a nuclear-free world can prevent catastrophe https://t.co/gcjkOIGPvg

Tweet Author:
europeangreens
Creation Date:
1 day ago
Tweet Contents:

RT @Melanie_Vogel_: La Chine est une dictature.

Un dictature qui organise le genocide des #Ouighours, menace illégitimement #Taiwan et sa…

Tweet Author:
europeangreens
Creation Date:
2 days ago
Tweet Contents:

RT @DritanAbazovic: Sto dana. Puno rada i još više rezultata. Tek će da bude. 🇪🇺🇲🇪🇪🇺🇲🇪 https://t.co/mxQt1h4lsD

Tweet Author:
europeangreens
Creation Date:
2 days ago

Sign up to our newsletter

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Fill in the blank.

Take charge of your future. Donate Green.

Chip in today to help us build a Greener Europe!

Donate

  • Organisation
    • About
    • History
    • Councils
    • Congresses
    • Finance Advisory Board
    • Amendments Committee
    • Conciliation Panel
  • People
    • Committee
    • Team
    • Vacancies
    • Traineeships
  • Networks and Working Groups
    • Networks
      • Balkan
      • Mediterranean
      • Gender
      • tilt!
      • Queer
      • Local Councillors
      • Seniors
      • Disability
    • Working Groups
      • Foreign and Security Policy
      • Future of Europe
      • Trade
  • Guidelines
    • Charter
    • Statutes
    • Rulebook
    • Finances
    • Privacy Policy
  • Our Positions
    • Positions
    • Resolutions
    • Policy Papers
    • Manifesto
  • Member Parties
  • News
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • Brand Assets
    • Communications Team
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • The Green Screen
    • Climate Action for the People and the Planet
    • Trans-Inclusive Feminist Campaign
    • European Green Recovery Campaign
  • Donate
Home

Rue du Taciturne 34

B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

T +32 (0) 2 626 07 20

info@europeangreens.eu

© European Greens - With the financial support of the European Parliament. Sole liability remains with the author.

cookies